Belarus vs Uruguay: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Belarus
14.42 billion
in 2025
Uruguay
18.85 billion
in 2025
Belarus rank
52nd
Uruguay rank
49th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Belarus
  • Uruguay
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B200320142025

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 18.85 billion against 14.42 billion in Belarus, a difference of 4.43 billion.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uruguay ahead.

Belarus ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 49th of 86 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 2.72 billion 4.40 billion 1.68 billion Uruguay
2010s 6.56 billion 13.77 billion 7.20 billion Uruguay
2020s 9.21 billion 16.78 billion 7.57 billion Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Belarus or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 18.85 billion against 14.42 billion in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Belarus and Uruguay?
4.43 billion, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Belarus ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 49th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Uruguay: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/belarus/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/belarus/uruguay/">Belarus vs Uruguay: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,785 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.