Iceland vs Tunisia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Iceland
7.73 billion
in 2025
Tunisia
7.10 billion
in 2014
Iceland rank
63rd
Tunisia rank
64th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Iceland
  • Tunisia
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B200020122025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 7.73 billion against 7.10 billion in Tunisia, a difference of 627.01 million.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Tunisia ahead.

Iceland ranks 63rd and Tunisia ranks 64th of 86 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.16 billion 8.99 billion 5.83 billion Tunisia
2010s 4.98 billion 7.67 billion 2.69 billion Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Iceland or Tunisia?
Iceland, at 7.73 billion against 7.10 billion in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Iceland and Tunisia?
627.01 million, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Iceland ranks 63rd and Tunisia ranks 64th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Tunisia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/iceland/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/iceland/tunisia/">Iceland vs Tunisia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,785 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.