Malta vs Seychelles: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Malta
822.85 million
in 2025
Seychelles
861.75 million
in 2025
Malta rank
86th
Seychelles rank
85th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Malta
  • Seychelles
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M200920172025

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 861.75 million against 822.85 million in Malta, a difference of 38.90 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 86th and Seychelles ranks 85th of 86 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Seychelles Difference Ahead
2010s 624.19 million 455.87 million 168.32 million Malta
2020s 757.04 million 695.44 million 61.60 million Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Malta or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 861.75 million against 822.85 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Malta and Seychelles?
38.90 million, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Seychelles?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Malta and Seychelles rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Malta ranks 86th and Seychelles ranks 85th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Seychelles: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/malta/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/malta/seychelles/">Malta vs Seychelles: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,785 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.