Peru vs Romania: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Peru
87.27 billion
in 2025
Romania
83.53 billion
in 2025
Peru rank
25th
Romania rank
26th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Peru
  • Romania
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B200120132025

How they compare

Peru currently reports 87.27 billion against 83.53 billion in Romania, a difference of 3.74 billion.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Romania ahead.

Peru ranks 25th and Romania ranks 26th of 86 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 30.35 billion 41.23 billion 10.88 billion Romania
2010s 57.57 billion 43.26 billion 14.31 billion Peru
2020s 75.28 billion 60.15 billion 15.13 billion Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Peru or Romania?
Peru, at 87.27 billion against 83.53 billion in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Peru and Romania?
3.74 billion, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Romania?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Peru and Romania rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Peru ranks 25th and Romania ranks 26th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Romania: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/peru/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/peru/romania/">Peru vs Romania: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,785 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.