Albania vs Ecuador: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Albania
8.58 billion
in 2025
Ecuador
9.80 billion
in 2025
Albania rank
61st
Ecuador rank
60th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Albania
  • Ecuador
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B201420192025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 9.80 billion against 8.58 billion in Albania, a difference of 1.22 billion.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Albania ahead.

Albania ranks 61st and Ecuador ranks 60th of 86 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Ecuador Difference Ahead
2010s 3.83 billion 2.55 billion 1.28 billion Albania
2020s 6.21 billion 7.44 billion 1.23 billion Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Albania or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 9.80 billion against 8.58 billion in Albania as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Albania and Ecuador?
1.22 billion, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Ecuador?
8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
How do Albania and Ecuador rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Albania ranks 61st and Ecuador ranks 60th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Ecuador: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/albania/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/albania/ecuador/">Albania vs Ecuador: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.