Austria vs Chile: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Austria
52.93 billion
in 2025
Chile
49.47 billion
in 2025
Austria rank
37th
Chile rank
38th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Austria
  • Chile
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B199920122025

How they compare

Austria currently reports 52.93 billion against 49.47 billion in Chile, a difference of 3.46 billion.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 37th and Chile ranks 38th of 86 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 14.86 billion 17.80 billion 2.94 billion Chile
2010s 23.69 billion 39.17 billion 15.48 billion Chile
2020s 36.20 billion 44.99 billion 8.79 billion Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Austria or Chile?
Austria, at 52.93 billion against 49.47 billion in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Austria and Chile?
3.46 billion, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Austria and Chile rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Austria ranks 37th and Chile ranks 38th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Chile: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/austria/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/austria/chile/">Austria vs Chile: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.