Belarus vs Ireland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Belarus
14.42 billion
in 2025
Ireland
13.64 billion
in 2025
Belarus rank
54th
Ireland rank
55th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Belarus
  • Ireland
05.0B10.0B15.0B200120132025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 14.42 billion against 13.64 billion in Ireland, a difference of 787.40 million.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Ireland ahead.

Belarus ranks 54th and Ireland ranks 55th of 86 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 2.72 billion 1.46 billion 1.26 billion Belarus
2010s 6.57 billion 3.01 billion 3.56 billion Belarus
2020s 9.22 billion 12.18 billion 2.96 billion Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Belarus or Ireland?
Belarus, at 14.42 billion against 13.64 billion in Ireland as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Belarus and Ireland?
787.40 million, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ireland?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Ireland rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Belarus ranks 54th and Ireland ranks 55th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ireland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/belarus/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/belarus/ireland/">Belarus vs Ireland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.