Brazil vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Brazil
358.23 billion
in 2025
Poland
271.12 billion
in 2025
Brazil rank
9th
Poland rank
11th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Brazil
  • Poland
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B200020122025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 358.23 billion against 271.12 billion in Poland, a difference of 87.12 billion.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Poland's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 9th and Poland ranks 11th of 86 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 174.62 billion 64.00 billion 110.62 billion Brazil
2010s 356.31 billion 107.49 billion 248.82 billion Brazil
2020s 347.59 billion 195.85 billion 151.74 billion Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Brazil or Poland?
Brazil, at 358.23 billion against 271.12 billion in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Brazil and Poland?
87.12 billion, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Brazil ranks 9th and Poland ranks 11th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/brazil/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/brazil/poland/">Brazil vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.