Bulgaria vs Chile: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Bulgaria
47.12 billion
in 2025
Chile
49.47 billion
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
41st
Chile rank
38th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Chile
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B200020122025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 49.47 billion against 47.12 billion in Bulgaria, a difference of 2.35 billion.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 41st and Chile ranks 38th of 86 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 12.93 billion 19.10 billion 6.17 billion Chile
2010s 22.74 billion 39.17 billion 16.43 billion Chile
2020s 42.53 billion 44.99 billion 2.46 billion Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Bulgaria or Chile?
Chile, at 49.47 billion against 47.12 billion in Bulgaria as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Bulgaria and Chile?
2.35 billion, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Chile?
23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do Bulgaria and Chile rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Bulgaria ranks 41st and Chile ranks 38th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Chile: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/bulgaria/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/bulgaria/chile/">Bulgaria vs Chile: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.