Colombia vs Sweden: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Colombia
65.74 billion
in 2025
Sweden
74.94 billion
in 2025
Colombia rank
32nd
Sweden rank
30th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Colombia
  • Sweden
20.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B200020122025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 74.94 billion against 65.74 billion in Colombia, a difference of 9.20 billion.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 30th of 86 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 20.22 billion 37.64 billion 17.42 billion Sweden
2010s 42.70 billion 57.46 billion 14.76 billion Sweden
2020s 60.00 billion 64.25 billion 4.25 billion Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Colombia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 74.94 billion against 65.74 billion in Colombia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Colombia and Sweden?
9.20 billion, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Sweden?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Colombia and Sweden rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Colombia ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 30th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Sweden: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/colombia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/colombia/sweden/">Colombia vs Sweden: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.