Cyprus vs Luxembourg: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Cyprus
2.92 billion
in 2025
Luxembourg
3.06 billion
in 2025
Cyprus rank
82nd
Luxembourg rank
81st

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Cyprus
  • Luxembourg
01.0B2.0B3.0B200620152025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 3.06 billion against 2.92 billion in Cyprus, a difference of 137.62 million.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 82nd and Luxembourg ranks 81st of 86 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2010s 982.92 million 930.74 million 52.18 million Cyprus
2020s 1.89 billion 2.63 billion 740.10 million Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Cyprus or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 3.06 billion against 2.92 billion in Cyprus as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Cyprus and Luxembourg?
137.62 million, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Luxembourg?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and Luxembourg rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Cyprus ranks 82nd and Luxembourg ranks 81st of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Luxembourg: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/cyprus/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/cyprus/luxembourg/">Cyprus vs Luxembourg: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.