Korea vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Korea
428.06 billion
in 2025
Singapore
409.28 billion
in 2025
Korea rank
6th
Singapore rank
8th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Korea
  • Singapore
100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B500.0B200020122025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 428.06 billion against 409.28 billion in Singapore, a difference of 18.78 billion.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 6th and Singapore ranks 8th of 86 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 236.56 billion 155.48 billion 81.08 billion Korea
2010s 357.58 billion 259.41 billion 98.18 billion Korea
2020s 432.20 billion 366.91 billion 65.29 billion Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Korea or Singapore?
Korea, at 428.06 billion against 409.28 billion in Singapore as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Korea and Singapore?
18.78 billion, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Singapore?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Korea and Singapore rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Korea ranks 6th and Singapore ranks 8th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/korea-rep/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/korea-rep/singapore/">Korea vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.