Lithuania vs Tunisia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Lithuania
7.09 billion
in 2025
Tunisia
7.13 billion
in 2014
Lithuania rank
65th
Tunisia rank
64th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Lithuania
  • Tunisia
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B200420142025

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 7.13 billion against 7.09 billion in Lithuania, a difference of 41.85 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Tunisia ahead.

Lithuania ranks 65th and Tunisia ranks 64th of 86 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 6.93 billion 9.01 billion 2.08 billion Tunisia
2010s 8.03 billion 7.70 billion 332.18 million Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Lithuania or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 7.13 billion against 7.09 billion in Lithuania as of 2014.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Lithuania and Tunisia?
41.85 million, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tunisia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Lithuania and Tunisia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Lithuania ranks 65th and Tunisia ranks 64th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Tunisia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/lithuania/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/lithuania/tunisia/">Lithuania vs Tunisia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.