Mexico vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Mexico
256.20 billion
in 2025
Poland
271.12 billion
in 2025
Mexico rank
13th
Poland rank
11th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Mexico
  • Poland
50.0B100.0B150.0B200.0B250.0B200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 271.12 billion against 256.20 billion in Mexico, a difference of 14.92 billion.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 13th and Poland ranks 11th of 86 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 89.68 billion 64.00 billion 25.68 billion Mexico
2010s 170.32 billion 107.49 billion 62.83 billion Mexico
2020s 218.43 billion 195.85 billion 22.59 billion Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Mexico or Poland?
Poland, at 271.12 billion against 256.20 billion in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Mexico and Poland?
14.92 billion, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Poland?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Mexico and Poland rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Mexico ranks 13th and Poland ranks 11th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/mexico/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-group-of-currencies/mexico/poland/">Mexico vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Group of currencies (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,790 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.