Armenia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Armenia
290,000
in 2025
Slovenia
18,365
in 2025
Armenia rank
24th
Slovenia rank
26th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Armenia
  • Slovenia
-1.0B-750.0M-500.0M-250.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 290,000 against 18,365 in Slovenia, a difference of 271,635.

That makes Armenia's figure about 15.8 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 24th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 66 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 24,018 -7.40 million 7.42 million Armenia
2010s -125,184 -2.27 million 2.14 million Armenia
2020s -426,627 267,130 693,757 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Armenia or Slovenia?
Armenia, at 290,000 against 18,365 in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Armenia and Slovenia?
271,635, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Slovenia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Slovenia rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Armenia ranks 24th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/armenia/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/armenia/slovenia/">Armenia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
68 places, 1,199 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.