Austria vs Sri Lanka: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Austria
-354.85 million
in 2025
Sri Lanka
-89.48 million
in 2025
Austria rank
61st
Sri Lanka rank
59th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Austria
  • Sri Lanka
-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M199920122025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports -89.48 million against -354.85 million in Austria, a difference of 265.37 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Austria ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 59th of 66 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s -553.31 million -15.69 million 537.63 million Sri Lanka
2020s -195.46 million -8.39 million 187.07 million Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Austria or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at -89.48 million against -354.85 million in Austria as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Austria and Sri Lanka?
265.37 million, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sri Lanka?
11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
How do Austria and Sri Lanka rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Austria ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 59th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Sri Lanka: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/austria/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/austria/sri-lanka/">Austria vs Sri Lanka: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
68 places, 1,199 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.