Belarus vs Russian Federation: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Belarus
0
in 2025
Russian Federation
1,000
in 2011
Belarus rank
28th
Russian Federation rank
27th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Belarus
  • Russian Federation
-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0200420142025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 1,000 against 0 in Belarus, a difference of 1,000.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Belarus ranks 28th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 66 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 8.77 million -11.47 million 20.24 million Belarus
2010s -638.50 million 1,000 638.50 million Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Belarus or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 1,000 against 0 in Belarus as of 2011.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Belarus and Russian Federation?
1,000, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Russian Federation?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2011.
How do Belarus and Russian Federation rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Belarus ranks 28th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Russian Federation: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/belarus/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/belarus/russian-federation/">Belarus vs Russian Federation: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
68 places, 1,199 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.