Costa Rica vs Jordan: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Costa Rica
27.14 million
in 2025
Jordan
56.02 million
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
15th
Jordan rank
13th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Jordan
-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M1.0B200720162025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 56.02 million against 27.14 million in Costa Rica, a difference of 28.88 million.

That makes Jordan's figure about 2.1 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 15th and Jordan ranks 13th of 66 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Jordan Difference Ahead
2010s 5.21 million 321.56 million 316.35 million Jordan
2020s 27.11 million 665.56 million 638.45 million Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Costa Rica or Jordan?
Jordan, at 56.02 million against 27.14 million in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Costa Rica and Jordan?
28.88 million, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Jordan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Jordan rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Costa Rica ranks 15th and Jordan ranks 13th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Jordan: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/costa-rica/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/costa-rica/jordan/">Costa Rica vs Jordan: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
68 places, 1,199 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.