Jordan vs Spain: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Jordan
56.02 million
in 2025
Spain
15.67 million
in 2025
Jordan rank
13th
Spain rank
16th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Jordan
  • Spain
-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B200020122025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 56.02 million against 15.67 million in Spain, a difference of 40.35 million.

That makes Jordan's figure about 3.6 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 13th and Spain ranks 16th of 66 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Spain Difference Ahead
2000s 0 168.09 million 168.09 million Spain
2010s 116.93 million 520.62 million 403.69 million Spain
2020s 665.56 million 88.89 million 576.67 million Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Jordan or Spain?
Jordan, at 56.02 million against 15.67 million in Spain as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Jordan and Spain?
40.35 million, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Spain?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Spain rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Jordan ranks 13th and Spain ranks 16th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Spain: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/jordan/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/jordan/spain/">Jordan vs Spain: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
68 places, 1,199 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.