Latvia vs South Africa: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Latvia
-42.30 million
in 2025
South Africa
-26.00 million
in 2025
Latvia rank
58th
South Africa rank
57th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Latvia
  • South Africa
02.0B4.0B6.0B200020122025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports -26.00 million against -42.30 million in Latvia, a difference of 16.30 million.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was South Africa ahead.

Latvia ranks 58th and South Africa ranks 57th of 66 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 47.19 million 12.00 million 35.19 million Latvia
2010s 106.16 million 2.46 billion 2.35 billion South Africa
2020s 41.63 million -93.67 million 135.30 million Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Latvia or South Africa?
South Africa, at -26.00 million against -42.30 million in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Latvia and South Africa?
16.30 million, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Africa?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Latvia and South Africa rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Latvia ranks 58th and South Africa ranks 57th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs South Africa: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/latvia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-assets-international-reserves/latvia/south-africa/">Latvia vs South Africa: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
68 places, 1,199 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.