Australia vs Japan: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Australia
1.65 billion
in 2025
Japan
959.00 million
in 2025
Australia rank
2nd
Japan rank
4th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Australia
  • Japan
-30.0B-20.0B-10.0B010.0B200020122025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.65 billion against 959.00 million in Japan, a difference of 688.82 million.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.7 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 4th of 53 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Japan Difference Ahead
2010s 226.12 million 1.37 billion 1.14 billion Japan
2020s 176.62 million 200.83 million 24.21 million Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Australia or Japan?
Australia, at 1.65 billion against 959.00 million in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Australia and Japan?
688.82 million, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Japan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Australia and Japan rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Australia ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), swaps, Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Japan: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-swaps-assets-international/australia/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-swaps-assets-international/australia/japan/">Australia vs Japan: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), swaps, Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 1,034 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.