Malta vs Portugal: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Malta
6.54 million
in 2025
Portugal
9.78 million
in 2025
Malta rank
16th
Portugal rank
13th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Malta
  • Portugal
01.0B2.0B3.0B200020122025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 9.78 million against 6.54 million in Malta, a difference of 3.24 million.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.5 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 16th and Portugal ranks 13th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s -13.24 million -89.19 million 75.95 million Malta
2010s -1.23 million 930.22 million 931.45 million Portugal
2020s 1.91 million 308.81 million 306.90 million Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Malta or Portugal?
Portugal, at 9.78 million against 6.54 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Malta and Portugal?
3.24 million, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Portugal?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Malta and Portugal rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Malta ranks 16th and Portugal ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), swaps, Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Portugal: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-swaps-assets-international/malta/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-swaps-assets-international/malta/portugal/">Malta vs Portugal: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), swaps, Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 1,034 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.