Slovakia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)

Slovakia
4.78 million
in 2024
Slovenia
18,365
in 2025
Slovakia rank
17th
Slovenia rank
19th

Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market) over time

  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
-1.0B-750.0M-500.0M-250.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 4.78 million against 18,365 in Slovenia, a difference of 4.76 million.

That makes Slovakia's figure about 260.2 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Slovakia ahead.

Slovakia ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 19th of 53 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovakia Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s -315,629 -1.56 million 1.24 million Slovakia
2020s 3.64 million 316,883 3.33 million Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market), Slovakia or Slovenia?
Slovakia, at 4.78 million against 18,365 in Slovenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market) between Slovakia and Slovenia?
4.76 million, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Slovenia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Slovakia and Slovenia rank globally for memorandum items, financial derivatives (net marked to market)?
Slovakia ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 19th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), swaps, Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovakia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-swaps-assets-international/slovak-republic/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-financial-derivatives-net-marked-to-market-swaps-assets-international/slovak-republic/slovenia/">Slovakia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Financial derivatives (net marked to market), swaps, Assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 1,034 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.