Australia vs Japan: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Australia
2.55 billion
in 2025
Japan
4.84 billion
in 2025
Australia rank
7th
Japan rank
4th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Australia
  • Japan
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B200120132025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 4.84 billion against 2.55 billion in Australia, a difference of 2.29 billion.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.9 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 7th and Japan ranks 4th of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 9.61 billion 1.22 billion 8.39 billion Australia
2010s 4.03 billion 3.02 billion 1.01 billion Australia
2020s 662.48 million 4.66 billion 4.00 billion Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Australia or Japan?
Japan, at 4.84 billion against 2.55 billion in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Australia and Japan?
2.29 billion, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Japan?
23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do Australia and Japan rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Australia ranks 7th and Japan ranks 4th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Japan: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/australia/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/australia/japan/">Australia vs Japan: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.