Belarus vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Belarus
100,010
in 2025
Netherlands
0
in 2025
Belarus rank
23rd
Netherlands rank
24th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Belarus
  • Netherlands
-2.0B-1.0B01.0B2.0B200020122025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 100,010 against 0 in Netherlands, a difference of 100,010.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 23rd and Netherlands ranks 24th of 60 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 274.93 million -510.00 million 784.93 million Belarus
2010s 692.60 million 274.90 million 417.70 million Belarus
2020s 158.08 million 14.17 million 143.92 million Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Belarus or Netherlands?
Belarus, at 100,010 against 0 in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Belarus and Netherlands?
100,010, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Netherlands?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Netherlands rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Belarus ranks 23rd and Netherlands ranks 24th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belarus/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belarus/netherlands/">Belarus vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.