Belarus vs Thailand: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Belarus
100,010
in 2025
Thailand
128,578
in 2020
Belarus rank
23rd
Thailand rank
22nd

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Belarus
  • Thailand
-1.0B01.0B2.0B200020122025

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 128,578 against 100,010 in Belarus, a difference of 28,568.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Thailand ahead.

Belarus ranks 23rd and Thailand ranks 22nd of 60 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 274.93 million -177.60 million 452.53 million Belarus
2010s 774.23 million 0 774.23 million Belarus
2020s 928.50 million 128,578 928.37 million Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Belarus or Thailand?
Thailand, at 128,578 against 100,010 in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Belarus and Thailand?
28,568, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Thailand?
13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Thailand rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Belarus ranks 23rd and Thailand ranks 22nd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Thailand: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belarus/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belarus/thailand/">Belarus vs Thailand: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.