Belarus vs United States: Memorandum items: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 … Securities

Belarus
100,010
in 2025
United States
0
in 2016
Belarus rank
23rd
United States rank
24th

Memorandum items: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 … Securities over time

  • Belarus
  • United States
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200020122025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 100,010 against 0 in United States, a difference of 100,010.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was United States ahead.

Belarus ranks 23rd and United States ranks 24th of 60 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus United States Difference Ahead
2000s 549.87 million 4.55 billion 4.00 billion United States
2010s 704.61 million 1.46 billion 756.91 million United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Belarus or United States?
Belarus, at 100,010 against 0 in United States as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Belarus and United States?
100,010, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and United States?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
How do Belarus and United States rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Belarus ranks 23rd and United States ranks 24th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs United States: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belarus/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belarus/united-states/">Belarus vs United States: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.