Belgium vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Belgium
521.70 million
in 2025
Singapore
999.00 million
in 2025
Belgium rank
12th
Singapore rank
10th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Belgium
  • Singapore
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B4.0B200020122025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 999.00 million against 521.70 million in Belgium, a difference of 477.30 million.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.9 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 12th and Singapore ranks 10th of 60 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s -515.89 million -274.25 million 241.64 million Singapore
2010s -2.19 billion 1.34 billion 3.54 billion Singapore
2020s -2.94 billion 582.08 million 3.52 billion Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Belgium or Singapore?
Singapore, at 999.00 million against 521.70 million in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Belgium and Singapore?
477.30 million, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Singapore rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Belgium ranks 12th and Singapore ranks 10th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belgium/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/belgium/singapore/">Belgium vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.