Chile vs Russia: Memorandum items: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 … Securities

Chile
272.38 million
in 2025
Russia
225.20 million
in 2025
Chile rank
14th
Russia rank
15th

Memorandum items: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 … Securities over time

  • Chile
  • Russia
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B200020122025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 272.38 million against 225.20 million in Russia, a difference of 47.18 million.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Russia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Russia ahead.

Chile ranks 14th and Russia ranks 15th of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Russia Difference Ahead
2000s 360.00 million 25.07 billion 24.71 billion Russia
2010s 162.13 million 5.03 billion 4.86 billion Russia
2020s 215.66 million 143.88 million 71.77 million Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Chile or Russia?
Chile, at 272.38 million against 225.20 million in Russia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Chile and Russia?
47.18 million, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Russia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Chile and Russia rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Chile ranks 14th and Russia ranks 15th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Russia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/chile/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/chile/russian-federation/">Chile vs Russia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.