Croatia vs Israel: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Croatia
71.79 million
in 2025
Israel
1.00 million
in 2025
Croatia rank
18th
Israel rank
21st

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Croatia
  • Israel
-6.0B-4.0B-2.0B02.0B4.0B200120132025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 71.79 million against 1.00 million in Israel, a difference of 70.79 million.

That makes Croatia's figure about 71.8 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 18th and Israel ranks 21st of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Israel Difference Ahead
2000s 885.88 million 1.06 billion 172.68 million Israel
2010s 1.12 billion 399.97 million 724.32 million Croatia
2020s 637.44 million -2.18 billion 2.82 billion Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Croatia or Israel?
Croatia, at 71.79 million against 1.00 million in Israel as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Croatia and Israel?
70.79 million, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Israel?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Israel rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Croatia ranks 18th and Israel ranks 21st of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Israel: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/croatia/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/croatia/israel/">Croatia vs Israel: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.