Denmark vs Japan: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Denmark
33.21 billion
in 2025
Japan
4.84 billion
in 2025
Denmark rank
1st
Japan rank
4th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Denmark
  • Japan
010.0B20.0B30.0B199920122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 33.21 billion against 4.84 billion in Japan, a difference of 28.37 billion.

That makes Denmark's figure about 6.9 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Japan ranks 4th of 60 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 16.58 billion 1.22 billion 15.36 billion Denmark
2010s 13.13 billion 3.02 billion 10.12 billion Denmark
2020s 10.15 billion 4.66 billion 5.49 billion Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Denmark or Japan?
Denmark, at 33.21 billion against 4.84 billion in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Denmark and Japan?
28.37 billion, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Denmark ranks 1st and Japan ranks 4th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Japan: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/denmark/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/denmark/japan/">Denmark vs Japan: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.