France vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

France
-204.34 million
in 2025
Slovenia
-111.47 million
in 2025
France rank
49th
Slovenia rank
48th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • France
  • Slovenia
-15.0B-10.0B-5.0B05.0B10.0B200020122025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports -111.47 million against -204.34 million in France, a difference of 92.87 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Slovenia ahead.

France ranks 49th and Slovenia ranks 48th of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s -9.35 billion -139.95 million 9.21 billion Slovenia
2010s -172.59 million -21.49 million 151.10 million Slovenia
2020s 2.24 billion -18.58 million 2.26 billion France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), France or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at -111.47 million against -204.34 million in France as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between France and Slovenia?
92.87 million, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Slovenia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do France and Slovenia rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
France ranks 49th and Slovenia ranks 48th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/france/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/france/slovenia/">France vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.