Hungary vs Italy: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Hungary
2.18 billion
in 2025
Italy
1.69 billion
in 2025
Hungary rank
8th
Italy rank
9th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Hungary
  • Italy
-10.0B-7.5B-5.0B-2.5B02.5B200020122025

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 2.18 billion against 1.69 billion in Italy, a difference of 491.35 million.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.3 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Italy ahead.

Hungary ranks 8th and Italy ranks 9th of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 20.05 million -874.60 million 894.65 million Hungary
2010s -432.44 million 107.06 million 539.50 million Italy
2020s -3.53 billion 906.18 million 4.44 billion Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Hungary or Italy?
Hungary, at 2.18 billion against 1.69 billion in Italy as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Hungary and Italy?
491.35 million, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Italy?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hungary and Italy rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Hungary ranks 8th and Italy ranks 9th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Italy: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/hungary/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/hungary/italy/">Hungary vs Italy: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.