Kazakhstan vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Kazakhstan
0
in 2022
Netherlands
0
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
24th
Netherlands rank
24th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Netherlands
-2.0B-1.0B01.0B200020122025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0 against 0 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 24th and Netherlands ranks 24th of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 245.43 million -587.29 million 832.71 million Kazakhstan
2010s 0 274.90 million 274.90 million Netherlands
2020s 0 28.33 million 28.33 million Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Kazakhstan or Netherlands?
Kazakhstan, at 0 against 0 in Netherlands as of 2022.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Kazakhstan and Netherlands?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Netherlands?
20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
How do Kazakhstan and Netherlands rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Kazakhstan ranks 24th and Netherlands ranks 24th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/kazakhstan/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/kazakhstan/netherlands/">Kazakhstan vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.