Lithuania vs Norway: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)

Lithuania
-263.67 million
in 2024
Norway
-355.75 million
in 2025
Lithuania rank
51st
Norway rank
53rd

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Norway
-15.0B-10.0B-5.0B05.0B200020122025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -263.67 million against -355.75 million in Norway, a difference of 92.08 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 51st and Norway ranks 53rd of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 67.55 million -8.33 billion 8.40 billion Lithuania
2010s -135.83 million 1.99 billion 2.13 billion Norway
2020s -324.53 million -402.43 million 77.89 million Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves), Lithuania or Norway?
Lithuania, at -263.67 million against -355.75 million in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves) between Lithuania and Norway?
92.08 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo (international reserves)?
Lithuania ranks 51st and Norway ranks 53rd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Norway: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/lithuania/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-international-reserves-and-foreign-currency/lithuania/norway/">Lithuania vs Norway: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,260 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.