Canada vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and

Canada
0
in 2025
Netherlands
0
in 2025
Canada rank
1st
Netherlands rank
1st

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and over time

  • Canada
  • Netherlands
-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0 against 0 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Netherlands ahead.

Canada ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 49 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s -1.62 billion -510.30 million 1.11 billion Netherlands
2010s -43.40 million -61.60 million 18.20 million Canada
2020s -25.00 million 0 25.00 million Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and, Canada or Netherlands?
Canada, at 0 against 0 in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and between Canada and Netherlands?
0, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Netherlands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Canada and Netherlands rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and?
Canada ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/canada/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/canada/netherlands/">Canada vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,065 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.