Croatia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and

Croatia
-220.00 million
in 2025
Slovenia
-111.47 million
in 2025
Croatia rank
30th
Slovenia rank
28th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and over time

  • Croatia
  • Slovenia
-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports -111.47 million against -220.00 million in Croatia, a difference of 108.53 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 30th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 49 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s -4.30 million -139.95 million 135.65 million Croatia
2010s -691.09 million -34.48 million 656.61 million Slovenia
2020s -1.16 billion -18.58 million 1.15 billion Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and, Croatia or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at -111.47 million against -220.00 million in Croatia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and between Croatia and Slovenia?
108.53 million, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Slovenia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Slovenia rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and?
Croatia ranks 30th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/croatia/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/croatia/slovenia/">Croatia vs Slovenia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,065 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.