Japan vs Mexico: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and

Japan
-178.51 billion
in 2025
Mexico
-27.37 billion
in 2025
Japan rank
49th
Mexico rank
46th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and over time

  • Japan
  • Mexico
-200.0B-150.0B-100.0B-50.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Mexico currently reports -27.37 billion against -178.51 billion in Japan, a difference of 151.14 billion.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 49th and Mexico ranks 46th of 49 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s -53.90 billion -33.94 billion 19.96 billion Mexico
2010s -133.49 billion -26.55 billion 106.95 billion Mexico
2020s -177.45 billion -30.31 billion 147.13 billion Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and, Japan or Mexico?
Mexico, at -27.37 billion against -178.51 billion in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and between Japan and Mexico?
151.14 billion, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mexico?
23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do Japan and Mexico rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and?
Japan ranks 49th and Mexico ranks 46th of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Mexico: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/japan/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/japan/mexico/">Japan vs Mexico: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,065 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.