Mauritius vs Slovakia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and

Mauritius
-1.64 billion
in 2025
Slovakia
-2.65 billion
in 2024
Mauritius rank
37th
Slovakia rank
38th

Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and over time

  • Mauritius
  • Slovakia
-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0200220132025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -1.64 billion against -2.65 billion in Slovakia, a difference of 1.01 billion.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 37th and Slovakia ranks 38th of 49 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Slovakia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 -1.26 billion 1.26 billion Mauritius
2020s -1.04 billion -2.07 billion 1.03 billion Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and, Mauritius or Slovakia?
Mauritius, at -1.64 billion against -2.65 billion in Slovakia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and between Mauritius and Slovakia?
1.01 billion, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovakia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Slovakia rank globally for memorandum items, securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and?
Mauritius ranks 37th and Slovakia ranks 38th of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Slovakia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/mauritius/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-securities-lent-and-on-repo-lent-or-repoed-and-included-in-section-i/mauritius/slovak-republic/">Mauritius vs Slovakia: Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Securities lent and on repo, lent or repoed and included in section I (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,065 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.