Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), annual

Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)
-7.61 % change on previous year
in 2016
Sao Tome and Principe
47.68 % change on previous year
in 2008
Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) rank
3rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
6th

Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), annual over time

  • Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0255075100199620062016

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 47.68 % change on previous year against -7.61 % change on previous year in Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC), a difference of 55.29 % change on previous year.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 6.3 times Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) ranks 3rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 6th of 3 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), annual, Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 47.68 % change on previous year against -7.61 % change on previous year in Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) as of 2008.
What is the difference in money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), annual between Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) and Sao Tome and Principe?
55.29 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) and Sao Tome and Principe?
8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.
How do Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), annual?
Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) ranks 3rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 6th of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-annual-growth-rate/central-african-economic-and-monetary-community-cemac/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-annual-growth-rate/central-african-economic-and-monetary-community-cemac/sao-tome-and-principe/">Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,621 data points, 1951–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.