Israel vs Trinidad and Tobago: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square

Israel
5.89 million units per square kilometre
in 2009
Trinidad and Tobago
5.20 million units per square kilometre
in 2009
Israel rank
53rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
55th

Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square over time

  • Israel
  • Trinidad and Tobago
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119852009

How they compare

Israel currently reports 5.89 million units per square kilometre against 5.20 million units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 696,420 units per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Israel ranks 53rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 55th of 158 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 9.21 units per square kilometre 24,029 units per square kilometre 24,019 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 62.24 units per square kilometre 93,456 units per square kilometre 93,394 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 74,646 units per square kilometre 409,259 units per square kilometre 334,613 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 777,332 units per square kilometre 724,803 units per square kilometre 52,529 units per square kilometre Israel
2000s 2.91 million units per square kilometre 2.48 million units per square kilometre 424,949 units per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), per square, Israel or Trinidad and Tobago?
Israel, at 5.89 million units per square kilometre against 5.20 million units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2009.
What is the difference in money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), per square between Israel and Trinidad and Tobago?
696,420 units per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Trinidad and Tobago?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2009.
How do Israel and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), per square?
Israel ranks 53rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 55th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Trinidad and Tobago: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/israel/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/israel/trinidad-and-tobago/">Israel vs Trinidad and Tobago: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 6,103 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.