Nigeria vs Trinidad and Tobago: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square

Nigeria
5.14 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Trinidad and Tobago
5.20 million units per square kilometre
in 2009
Nigeria rank
56th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
55th

Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square over time

  • Nigeria
  • Trinidad and Tobago
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119852009

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 5.20 million units per square kilometre against 5.14 million units per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 59,400 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Nigeria ranks 56th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 55th of 158 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 349.16 units per square kilometre 24,029 units per square kilometre 23,679 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 3,000 units per square kilometre 93,456 units per square kilometre 90,456 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 15,527 units per square kilometre 409,259 units per square kilometre 393,732 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 209,899 units per square kilometre 724,803 units per square kilometre 514,904 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1.92 million units per square kilometre 2.18 million units per square kilometre 257,752 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), per square, Nigeria or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 5.20 million units per square kilometre against 5.14 million units per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2009.
What is the difference in money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), per square between Nigeria and Trinidad and Tobago?
59,400 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Trinidad and Tobago?
48 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2008.
How do Nigeria and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for money (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), per square?
Nigeria ranks 56th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 55th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Trinidad and Tobago: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/trinidad-and-tobago/">Nigeria vs Trinidad and Tobago: Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 6,103 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.