Jordan vs New Zealand: Money, Seasonally adjusted (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic)

Jordan
116,184 units per square kilometre
in 2016
New Zealand
134,787 units per square kilometre
in 2010
Jordan rank
125th
New Zealand rank
122nd

Money, Seasonally adjusted (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic) over time

  • Jordan
  • New Zealand
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119882016

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 134,787 units per square kilometre against 116,184 units per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 18,603 units per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 125th and New Zealand ranks 122nd of 153 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 647.4 units per square kilometre 2,805 units per square kilometre 2,158 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 2,653 units per square kilometre 5,934 units per square kilometre 3,282 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 10,362 units per square kilometre 16,900 units per square kilometre 6,538 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 18,826 units per square kilometre 38,355 units per square kilometre 19,529 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 42,102 units per square kilometre 124,042 units per square kilometre 81,939 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 73,788 units per square kilometre 134,787 units per square kilometre 60,998 units per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher money, seasonally adjusted (depository corporations survey, domestic), Jordan or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 134,787 units per square kilometre against 116,184 units per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2010.
What is the difference in money, seasonally adjusted (depository corporations survey, domestic) between Jordan and New Zealand?
18,603 units per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Zealand?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2010.
How do Jordan and New Zealand rank globally for money, seasonally adjusted (depository corporations survey, domestic)?
Jordan ranks 125th and New Zealand ranks 122nd of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Money, Seasonally adjusted (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs New Zealand: Money, Seasonally adjusted (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-seasonally-adjusted-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square/jordan/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/money-seasonally-adjusted-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square/jordan/new-zealand/">Jordan vs New Zealand: Money, Seasonally adjusted (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Money, Seasonally adjusted (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
153 places, 5,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Money, Seasonally adjusted (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.