Ghana vs Latvia: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per capita
Ghana
7,823 current LCU per person
in 2024
Latvia
8,595 current LCU per person
in 2024
Ghana rank
161st
Latvia rank
159th
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per capita over time
- Ghana
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 8,595 current LCU per person against 7,823 current LCU per person in Ghana, a difference of 772 current LCU per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 159th of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,822 current LCU per person | 7,125 current LCU per person | 5,303 current LCU per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 6,370 current LCU per person | 8,262 current LCU per person | 1,892 current LCU per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per capita, Ghana or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 8,595 current LCU per person against 7,823 current LCU per person in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per capita between Ghana and Latvia?
- 772 current LCU per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per capita?
- Ghana ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 159th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.