Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
188.56 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
22nd
Rwanda rank
25th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196419932023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 188.56 million current LCU per square kilometre against 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 16.75 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Rwanda ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 175,822 current LCU per square kilometre 183,479 current LCU per square kilometre 7,658 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 872,299 current LCU per square kilometre 632,554 current LCU per square kilometre 239,745 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 3.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 897,099 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 15.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 72.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 40.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 32.51 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 163.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 132.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
Bangladesh, at 188.56 million current LCU per square kilometre against 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
16.75 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/">Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.