Bangladesh vs Uganda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
188.56 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
209.83 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
22nd
Uganda rank
20th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Uganda
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196619942023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 209.83 million current LCU per square kilometre against 188.56 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 21.27 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 20th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 175,822 current LCU per square kilometre 404.33 current LCU per square kilometre 175,417 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 665,459 current LCU per square kilometre 15,017 current LCU per square kilometre 650,442 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 3.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.15 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 15.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.71 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 72.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 64.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.53 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 163.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 167.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.82 million current LCU per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Uganda?
Uganda, at 209.83 million current LCU per square kilometre against 188.56 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Uganda?
21.27 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uganda?
45 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Uganda rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 20th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Uganda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/uganda/">Bangladesh vs Uganda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.