Brazil vs Nicaragua: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Brazil
1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
128th
Nicaragua rank
131st

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Nicaragua
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 355,440 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Brazil ranks 128th and Nicaragua ranks 131st of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.0143 current LCU per square kilometre 1.54 current LCU per square kilometre 1.53 current LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 37,968 current LCU per square kilometre 203,158 current LCU per square kilometre 165,190 current LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 207,504 current LCU per square kilometre 543,947 current LCU per square kilometre 336,443 current LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 730,940 current LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 482,314 current LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 1.43 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 114,425 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Brazil or Nicaragua?
Brazil, at 1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Brazil and Nicaragua?
355,440 current LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Nicaragua?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Nicaragua rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 128th and Nicaragua ranks 131st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Nicaragua: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/nicaragua/">Brazil vs Nicaragua: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.