Chile vs Uganda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
342.66 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
209.83 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
17th
Uganda rank
20th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Uganda
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 342.66 million current LCU per square kilometre against 209.83 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 132.82 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.6 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Uganda ahead.

Chile ranks 17th and Uganda ranks 20th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 11.2 current LCU per square kilometre 46.27 current LCU per square kilometre 35.07 current LCU per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 99,726 current LCU per square kilometre 289.19 current LCU per square kilometre 99,437 current LCU per square kilometre Chile
1980s 2.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 15,017 current LCU per square kilometre 2.36 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
1990s 23.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 21.28 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 63.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 55.52 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 169.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 64.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 105.01 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 311.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 167.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 144.75 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Uganda?
Chile, at 342.66 million current LCU per square kilometre against 209.83 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Uganda?
132.82 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uganda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Chile and Uganda rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 17th and Uganda ranks 20th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Uganda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/uganda/">Chile vs Uganda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.