Denmark vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

Denmark
141.43 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
26th
Rwanda rank
25th

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre against 141.43 million current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 30.38 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 47,278 current LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 2.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 154,208 current LCU per square kilometre 2.43 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 8.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 632,554 current LCU per square kilometre 8.21 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 14.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.34 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 73.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 68.29 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 110.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 40.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 69.97 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 139.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 132.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.84 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, Denmark or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 171.81 million current LCU per square kilometre against 141.43 million current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between Denmark and Rwanda?
30.38 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Rwanda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Rwanda rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/rwanda/">Denmark vs Rwanda: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.