El Salvador vs Tunisia: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre

El Salvador
1.12 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
902,324 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
138th
Tunisia rank
141st

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Tunisia
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 1.12 million current LCU per square kilometre against 902,324 current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 213,256 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 138th and Tunisia ranks 141st of 185 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 9,311 current LCU per square kilometre 1,414 current LCU per square kilometre 7,897 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 30,156 current LCU per square kilometre 4,701 current LCU per square kilometre 25,455 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 79,669 current LCU per square kilometre 24,446 current LCU per square kilometre 55,223 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 160,273 current LCU per square kilometre 62,075 current LCU per square kilometre 98,198 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 415,539 current LCU per square kilometre 166,548 current LCU per square kilometre 248,991 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 626,261 current LCU per square kilometre 442,174 current LCU per square kilometre 184,087 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 979,891 current LCU per square kilometre 803,923 current LCU per square kilometre 175,968 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Tunisia?
El Salvador, at 1.12 million current LCU per square kilometre against 902,324 current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Tunisia?
213,256 current LCU per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Tunisia rank globally for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 138th and Tunisia ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Tunisia: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/tunisia/">El Salvador vs Tunisia: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.